The Piotroski F-Score calculation for CAA / CalAtlantic Group, Inc. is shown here. In 2000, Joseph Piotroski published a paper titled "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers." This paper described a method of using data from a company's financial reports to help predict future performance.

The Piotroski F-Score, as it is known, is a 9-point discrete score, where 9 is the best, that ranks companies based on a number of financial factors. To calculate the score, we compare nine factors from the two most recent annual reports. If the change in the factor is "good", then we add one to the score. If the change in the factor is "not good", then we add zero. The following explanations are quoted from the paper.

CAA / CalAtlantic Group, Inc. Piotroski F-Score

6

Profitability

Current profitability and cash flow realizations provide information about the firm’s ability to generate funds internally. Given the poor historical earnings performance of many value firms, any firm currently generating positive cash flow or profits is demonstrating a capacity to generate funds through operating activities. Similarly, a positive earnings trend is suggestive of an improvement in the firm’s underlying ability to generate positive future cash flows.

ROA : Net Income before Extraordinary Items, scaled by Total Assets at beginning of year

0.06

+1


CFO: Cash Flow from Operations, scaled by Total Assets at beginning of year

0.04

+1


ΔROA: Current Year's ROA less Prior Year's ROA. If this negative, ROA (and therefore profitability) has decreased.

0.01

+1


ACCRUAL: Current Year's Net Income before Extraordinary Items less Cash Flow from Operations, scaled by Total Assets at beginning of year. In short, one if CFO > ROA. The relationship between earnings and cash flow levels is also considered. Earnings driven by positive accrual adjustments (i.e., profits are greater than cash flow from operations) is a bad signal about future profitability and returns. This relationship may be particularly important among value firms, where the incentive to manage earnings through positive accruals (e.g., to prevent covenant violations) is strong.

0.02

+1

Financial Leverage, Liquidity, and Source of Funds

Three of the nine financial signals are designed to measure changes in capital structure and the firm's ability to meet future debt service obligations. Since many value firms are financially constrained, we assume that an increase in leverage, a deterioration of liquidity, or the use of external financing is a bad signal about financial risk.

ΔLEVER: The historical change in the ratio of long-term debt to average total assets. By raising external capital, a financially distressed firm is signaling its inability to generate sufficient internal funds. In addition, an increase in long-term debt is likely to place additional constraints on the firm’s financial flexibility. An increase in financial leverage is a negative.

-0.09

+1


ΔLIQUID: The historical change in the firm’s current ratio between the current and prior year, where we define the current ratio as the ratio of current assets to current liabilities at fiscal year-end. An improvement in liquidity is a good signal.

+0


EQ_OFFER: One if the firm did not issue common equity in the year, zero otherwise. Similar to an increase in long-term debt, financially distressed firms that raise external capital could be signaling their inability to generate sufficient internal funds to service future obligations. Moreover, the fact that these firms are willing to issue equity when their stock prices are likely to be depressed (i.e., high cost of capital) highlights the poor financial condition facing these firms.

-6,819,877

+1

Operating Efficiency

The remaining two signals are designed to measure changes in the efficiency of the firm’s operations. These ratios are important because they reflect two key constructs underlying a decomposition of return on assets.

ΔMARGIN: The firm’s current gross margin ratio (gross margin scaled by total sales) less the prior year’s gross margin ratio. An improvement in margins signifies a potential improvement in factor costs, a reduction in inventory costs, or a rise in the price of the firm’s product.

+0


ΔTURN: The firm’s current year asset turnover ratio (total sales scaled by beginning of the year total assets) less the prior year’s asset turnover ratio. An improvement in asset turnover signifies greater productivity from the asset base. Such an improvement can arise from more efficient operations (fewer assets generating the same levels of sales) or an increase in sales (which could also signify improved market conditions for the firm’s products).

0.19

+1

Peers - Operative Builders (1531)

Related Articles

BLDP: Ballard Power Systems Analysis and Research Report

2018-08-13 - Asif

Core Business At Ballard, Ballard Power Systems is building a clean energy growth company. Ballard Power Systems is recognized as a world leader in proton exchange membrane (“PEM”) fuel cell power system development and commercialization. The company's principal business is the design, development, manufacture, sale and service of PEM fuel cell products for a variety of applications, focusing on its power product markets of Heavy-Duty Motive (consisting of bus, truck, rail and marine applications), Portable Power, Material Handling and Backup Power, as well as the delivery of Technology Solutions, including engineering services, technology transfer, and the license and sale of its extensive intellectual property portfolio and fundamental knowledge for a variety of fuel cell applications. A fuel cell is an environmentally clean electrochemical device that combines hydrogen fuel with oxygen (from the air) to produce electricity. The hydrogen fuel can be obtained from natural g...

MARA: Marathon Patent Group Analysis and Research Report

2018-08-13 - Asif

Overview Marathon Patent Group was incorporated in the State of Nevada on February 23, 2010 under the name Verve Ventures, Inc. On December 7, 2011, the company changed its name to American Strategic Minerals Corporation and were engaged in exploration and potential development of uranium and vanadium minerals business. In June 2012, the company discontinued its minerals business and began to invest in real estate properties in Southern California. In October 2012, the company discontinued its real estate business when its former CEO joined the firm and the company commenced its IP licensing operations, at which time the Company’s name was changed to Marathon Patent Group, Inc. On November 1, 2017, the company entered into a merger agreement with Global Bit Ventures, Inc. (“GBV”), which is focused on mining digital assets. Marathon Patent Group has since purchased its cryptocurrency mining machines and established a data center in Canada to mine digital assets. Following the me...

ECYT: Endocyte Analysis and Research Report

2018-08-13 - Asif

Business and Organization Endocyte, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company and leader in developing targeted therapies for the treatment of cancer. The Company uses drug conjugation technology to create novel therapeutics and companion imaging agents for personalized targeted therapies. The agents actively target receptors that are over-expressed on diseased cells relative to healthy cells, such as prostate specific membrane antigen (“PSMA”) in prostate cancer. This targeted approach is designed to safely enable the delivery of highly potent drug payloads. The companion imaging agents are designed to identify patients whose disease over-expresses the target of the therapy and who are therefore more likely to benefit from treatment. In September 2017, the Company entered into a Development and License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with ABX advanced biochemical compounds – Biomedizinische Forschungsreagenzien GmbH (“ABX”), pursuant to which the Company acquired exclusive ...

Related News Stories

5 Factors That Underscore Lennar's (LEN) Solid Prospects

2018-07-02 zacks
Lennar Corporation’s (LEN - Free Report) shares have been rallying since the second-quarter fiscal 2018 release on Jun 26, 2018. In fact, the nation’s largest homebuilder has outperformed the homebuilding industry so far this year. Although Lennar deteriorated 17% year to date, it fared better than the broader industry’s 19.7% decline. Recently, Lennar posted stellar second-quarter results, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate on both counts. (20-0)

Lennar (LEN) Q2 Earnings Beat on CalAtlantic Synergies

2018-06-26 zacks
Lennar Corporation’s (LEN - Free Report) shares have gained 7.5% in pre-market trading, after surpassing earnings as well as revenue expectations in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 – the first full quarter with CalAtlantic. The company’s second-quarter adjusted earnings of $1.58 per share surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 45 cents. The reported figure mainly excludes integration costs related to the acquisition of CalAtlantic Group, Inc. (25-0)

Lennar's (LEN) Q2 Earnings & Revenues Beat Estimates

2018-06-26 zacks
Lennar Corporation (LEN - Free Report) is one of the leading homebuilders in the United States. With overall housing market recovering at a slow but steady pace, Lennar's order trends have been improving at a consistent pace. Lennar is performing well on the back of its diverse revenue mix, large land supply, above average order growth and better pricing power. Investors should also note that 2018 earnings estimate for LEN has remained stable in the past 60 days. (19-0)

Will Higher Costs Weigh Down Lennar's (LEN) Q2 Earnings?

2018-06-25 zacks
Lennar Corporation (LEN - Free Report) is scheduled to announce second-quarter fiscal 2018 results on Jun 26, before the opening bell. Lennar has been showcasing solid top-line performances and the trend is supposed to continue in the soon-to-be-reported quarter as well, courtesy of robust demand for homes, favorable job market and impressive economic conditions. Let’s take a look at how the company's margin is shaping up for this earnings season. (20-0)

Zacks Industry Outlook Highlights: Lennar, M/I Homes and William Lyon Homes

2018-06-04 zacks
Chicago, IL – June 4, 2018 – Today, Zacks Equity Research discusses the Industry: Housing, Part 2, including Lennar (LEN - Free Report) , M/I Homes, Inc. (MHO - Free Report) and William Lyon Homes (WLH - Free Report) . (52-0)

CUSIP: 128195104